Comments for California Property Rights Journal http://capropertyrights.com California Property Rights Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:25:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Comment on Can the government take away the right to fish? by Sos Save Our State http://capropertyrights.com/2009/11/09/can-the-government-take-away-the-right-to-fish/#comment-87 Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:25:53 +0000 http://capropertyrights.com/?p=85#comment-87 I should have also stated that your constitutional state rights are also measured against yours, and others constitutional federal rights. So the federal courts are going to be used to temper state rights for the protection of migratory fish.

]]> Comment on Can the government take away the right to fish? by Sos Save Our State http://capropertyrights.com/2009/11/09/can-the-government-take-away-the-right-to-fish/#comment-86 Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:23:11 +0000 http://capropertyrights.com/?p=85#comment-86 The california constitution section 25, article 1 still gives the power to the state to set the conditions under which the different spiecies of fish may be taken. A closure of an area for the protection of spiecies is likely to survive any challenge under constitutional right, unless……the state gives a privilege to classes of fisherman, IE private companies that it doesn’t extend to individuals. So if it allowed certain companies to fish under some paid licensing or permit, but denied the public, that would be an infringement on your rights

]]> Comment on Any dolts for a volt? by T Payne http://capropertyrights.com/2011/09/01/any-dolts-for-a-volt/#comment-84 Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:54:11 +0000 http://capropertyrights.com/?p=188#comment-84 But Wait!
There’s more!
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/white-house-backed-solar-solyndra-company-collapses/story?id=14420755

]]> Comment on California Tax Plan Foiled By the Law of Unintended Consequences by Mark Alpert http://capropertyrights.com/2011/06/30/california-tax-plan-foiled-by-the-law-of-unintended-consequences/#comment-75 Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:16:47 +0000 http://capropertyrights.com/?p=176#comment-75 Interesting–the advocacy of solar power has its own unintended consequences. It reduces utility taxes. Thus, the County government wants to pass new regulations to recover that income.

]]> Comment on California Tax Plan Foiled By the Law of Unintended Consequences by T Payne http://capropertyrights.com/2011/06/30/california-tax-plan-foiled-by-the-law-of-unintended-consequences/#comment-74 Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:43:40 +0000 http://capropertyrights.com/?p=176#comment-74 Not even a little surprised at this turn of events. Keep an eye out for the news about Riverside County trying to skim 2% from all new commercial solar projects. If anyone could screw up the economics of solar photovoltaic power, Riverside County could. When our government employees do not work in a competitive environment, they fail to understand the competition for private sector dollars and how it affects the prosperity of all their constituents. And you thought the sun was free?

]]> Comment on City of Los Angeles Set to Block CPI Increases Under Rent Control by Mark Alpert http://capropertyrights.com/2010/05/10/city-of-los-angeles-set-to-block-cpi-increases-under-rent-control/#comment-50 Wed, 26 May 2010 19:58:30 +0000 http://capropertyrights.com/?p=119#comment-50 I agree cranky, but I had to edit out the foul language!

]]> Comment on City of Los Angeles Set to Block CPI Increases Under Rent Control by crankylandlord http://capropertyrights.com/2010/05/10/city-of-los-angeles-set-to-block-cpi-increases-under-rent-control/#comment-49 Thu, 20 May 2010 01:33:34 +0000 http://capropertyrights.com/?p=119#comment-49 Clowncilman Alarcon is a scumsucker! This has nothing to do with affordable housing. “61 percent of residents are renters” The ahole simply knows where to go for the votes!! What about the huge increases in costs to run an apartment building? These cost increase way more than the CPI. Water and Power, Insurance, Plumbers, Legal Costs..THESE ALL GO UP MORE THAN 3% a year!

]]> Comment on Ninth Circuit Finds Goleta Rent Control Ordinance Causes Taking by Mark Alpert http://capropertyrights.com/2009/09/30/ninth-circuit-finds-goleta-rent-control-ordinance-causes-taking/#comment-43 Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:20:12 +0000 http://capropertyrights.com/?p=65#comment-43 The Ninth Circuit has no deadline for deciding on rehearing. I would expect to hear something in the next few months.

]]> Comment on Ninth Circuit Finds Goleta Rent Control Ordinance Causes Taking by Al Schlarmann http://capropertyrights.com/2009/09/30/ninth-circuit-finds-goleta-rent-control-ordinance-causes-taking/#comment-42 Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:08:29 +0000 http://capropertyrights.com/?p=65#comment-42 When will we know if the Ninth Circuit grants a rehearing?
I am one of the owners of a small mobile home park. the old, single wide mobile homes have an appraised value of about $12,000 but sell for $50,000 plus because of rent control over the space rent.

]]> Comment on Racetrack Development A Threat to Poppyseed Fields a Mile Away by Wendy Reed http://capropertyrights.com/2009/07/27/racetrack-development-a-threat-to-poppyseed-fields-a-mile-away/#comment-40 Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:52:28 +0000 http://capropertyrights.com/?p=55#comment-40 The County General Plan, zoning, and County Code do not allow the type of project proposed. The response that “It is his land” is not an intelligent response.

As to economics, the project will have a negative impact on the regional economics, passing externalities from the project to the public and harming existing economic activities, land values over a wide swath, and harming what is lovely about the area to satisfy a few private clubbers.

]]>